Bernhard Langer’s putting stroke – one that bears striking resemblance to a prohibited action according to the anchoring ban – again found headlines last weekend, as the topic took centre stage during the TV broadcast of the US Senior Open. Also chiming in was Golf Channel’s Brandel Chamblee, who took to Twitter to voice his disapproval with the proceedings.
Speaking with Golf Digest’s Tim Rosaforte on Monday, Chamblee doubled down on his opposition.
“As a player, I certainly wouldn’t want any hint of impropriety attached,” Chamblee told Rosaforte. “And I can’t imagine why somebody who’s played their entire career with so much integrity attached to everything he’s done to have his career marred by any hint of impropriety.”
Langer met with USGA officials at Salem Country Club regarding the anchoring complaints, specifically about the putter shaft touching his body.
“They brought it to my attention, but they said it was totally within the rules,” Langer said over the weekend. “For people to be complaining, they often don’t know what they are talking about.”
But video evidence from the tournament does suggest Langer’s stroke seems to be in violation of the ban.
“Anybody who sees what Langer and Scott McCarron and Ian Woosnam are doing knows its questionable,” said Chamblee. “The whispers are out there. All of the players look askance whether they say it openly or not, I’ve talked enough of them to know – and many have contacted me – they all look askance at what’s going on out there there.
“And intent, I think this is apprehension on the governing body’s part not to ruffle feathers further. When it’s time to dig in, they’re reluctant to do so. Their acquiescence is to pass this rule, but the only violation is the intent to break this rule.”
It’s this vagueness that’s causing the issue, said Chamblee, citing the need for a clearer interpretation of the law.
“You have to come up with a more definitive way to enforce this rule,” Chamblee said. “Basically what the USGA is saying is, ‘If you can live with cheating, then fine. If you can sleep with yourself, then fine.'”
It reminded Chamblee of a story about Arnold Palmer, one that he believes should be the guiding light on this anchoring ambiguity.
The king, playing with former US PGA Tour pro Gibby Gilbert, asked Gilbert if he thought a green indentation was a ball’s pitch mark. Gilbert wasn’t sure, but told Palmer he’d give him the benefit of the doubt.
“I don’t want the benefit of the doubt, I want to know what you think,” Palmer replied, according to Chamblee. “Is it or is it not a ball mark?”
To Chamblee, the implication is Palmer didn’t want any doubt to what he was doing.
“That’s part of Palmer’s legacy when it comes to his conduct on the golf course,” Chamblee said. “It was above reproach.
“And what Langer and McCarron are doing is not above reproach. It’s not right what they’re doing.”